Browsing archives for 'Apologetics'

Two Recent Reads: Love Wins by Rob Bell & Erasing Hell by Francis Chan

Apologetics,Eschatology,Faith,Review,Theology 13 May 2013 | 0 Comments

Love Wins - Erasing Hell

This Past Weekend I Preached About Hell

This past weekend at Basileia, I preached a sermon addressing the question, “How Could a Loving God Send People to Hell?”  It was a challenging and sobering sermon, and I can honestly say that I’m glad I don’t have to address such emotional and sobering topics every week.  You can listen here if you’re interested.

In preparing to address this topic, I thought it might be prudent to reacquaint myself with the controversy surrounding Rob Bell’s book Love Wins.  When the book came out about two years ago, I knew I didn’t agree with Rob’s view, but frankly I just didn’t feel like getting overly involved in the controversy.  As it was, a few off-handed comments I made on Facebook got me more involved than I meant to be.  But I’ve waited to read the actual book until an opportune time presented itself.

So this past week, I quickly “audio-booked” a copy of Love Wins.  I followed my reading with a few reviews on the book by people I trust, but then I decided to go ahead an “audio-book” a copy of Francis Chan’s book, Erasing Hell, which is sort of a rebuttal.  To call Erasing Hell a rebuttal is a bit of stretch honestly, it does address Bell’s views, and it was written in response to Love Wins, but it basically just takes a fresh look at what the Bible says on the topic of heaven and hell.

I’m Not Sure There’s Much of a Point in Writing a Detailed Review

There’s really no reason for me to get into a detailed review of each book (because there’s a ton of reviews on the interwebs).  However, I will say this:  I think Rob Bell is a great writer and a compelling communicator, but I also think he’s misrepresenting the Bible on the issue of heaven and hell.  Bell can claim that he is technically not a universalist because he still believes in the concept of heaven and hell, but readers should know that he completely redefines the definitions of both.  Rob’s somewhat unique ideas have been alluded to in his other books and sermons for quite some time, but he really fleshes them out in Love Wins.  Love Wins is an extremely convincing book until you begin to look closely, and then everything falls apart.

When I Was in Junior High, Starter Jackets Were All the Rage.

When I was in Junior High, Starter jackets were all the rage.  To be cool, you had to have a Starter jacket.  And I really wanted one, but I didn’t have a hundred dollars, and neither did my parents.  But my best friend, Chris Medina, had a step dad who was overseas in the military, and he could get Starter jackets for thirty-five dollars.  Finally I had my chance!  I could afford thirty-five bucks!  I chose a Washington Redskins jacket (I still have it to this day) and I couldn’t wait for Chris’ dad to ship it back from overseas.  However, when the jacket finally arrived, things just weren’t quite right.  It looked like a Starter jacket, and it felt like a Starter jacket, but I noticed the stitching was a little off. Starter’s normal high quality seemed a bit “jankey.”  The Starter logo didn’t look right, and the tags on the inside of the coat didn’t seem authentic.  I quickly realized that I had a fake.  It was a pretty good looking fake, but it was fake. Everything seemed ok, until I looked closely.  Rob Bell’s theology in Love Wins looks and sounds great . . . at first.  But as you begin to examine it more closely, you begin to realize everything is a little off.  The facts don’t add up.  It begins to seem “jankey.” It looks good at first, but it’s a fake.

Like a 300 Pound Linebacker

The best way to examine this reality for yourself is to read Bell’s book and then read Chan’s book Erasing Hell back to back.  I actually like Chan’s rebuttal of Love Wins more than anyone else’s.  He’s extremely gracious and careful and thorough.  And he writes in a somewhat similar fashion, for a similar audience, and with a similar sized book.  To put it bluntly though, Erasing Hell annihilates the theology in Love Wins, but it does so in a really nice way.  It’s like getting tackled by a 300 pound linebacker, and then having that linebacker help you back up off the ground.  But honestly, it’s hard to even take Bell seriously after reading Chan.  You just realize that Bell did really poor exegesis, really poor historical research, really poor word studies, and a really poor job of exploring the Bible’s overall scope on the topic of heaven and hell.  I highly recommend Erasing Hell, and honestly I can’t say enough about how helpful a book it is on this entire topic.  Thank you Francis Chan!

I know some of you who may read this blog post will disagree with much of what I’ve just said, and that’s fine.  You’re entitled to your own opinion, and I’m entitled to mine.  But, I would urge anyone who is wresting with the issue of heaven and hell, or who has read Rob Bell, and read about the controversy surrounding Love Wins, and wonders if Rob Bell is telling them the truth or lying, to please consider reading Erasing Hell. Just give it a shot.  And then read the Bible passages that each book mentions for yourself.  Read them in context, and ask yourself, “What is the Bible really saying?”  And finally, ask God to reveal to you what He has really said on the topic of heaven and hell.

You May Not Like What You Find

If you examine closely and honestly, you may not like what you find.  But God continually asks us to trust Him and embrace hard truths throughout the Bible. We have to do this with the topic of judgment and hell too.  Honestly, we cannot afford to be wrong on this issue.

Related Posts:

Tagged in , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Book Review: Cornelius Van Til, Reformed Apologist and Churchman – by John R. Muether

Apologetics,Faith,Review,Theology 10 September 2011 | 0 Comments

A Biography on Cornelius Van Til

I wrote a paper on Cornelius Van Til’s apologetic method back when I was in seminary, and since then I’ve been intrigued by his writings and his life.  So it was only natural that I found myself purchasing a biography on Van Til when I saw it sitting so pretty and seductive on the shelf at our local Christian bookstore (shoutout to Logos!).  I have problem with buying books, so you’ll have to excuse my use of the word “seductive.” Anyway, you should know that I’m not so much interested in reviewing this biography (deceiving blog title I know), but I would like to post two things that seemed to stick with me as I finished reading it…

Van Til the Husband

The day after Van Til’s wife of 52 years died – her name was Rena – one of Van Til’s colleagues wrote the following note to him:

“You have been, and are, probably the most remarkable husband I have ever seen.  No one else could have given Rena the care, support, and admiration which you have given her over the years.  Time has not dulled your patience and steadfastness.  You have thought of her and her welfare over the years and under all possible conditions and have done everything you could to make life possible for her.  If have been a most remarkable demonstration of Christian love and tenderness and is a patter that I am sure no one will equal for uncounted time (213).”

I want to be a husband like that.  Not much else I can say; just that at the end of my life I want to be known as a man who deeply loved, protected, and provided for Magen.

Van Til & Reconciliation

I’m a Baptist, and we have plenty of demons in our own closet, but I was struck by how much of Van Til’s time seemed to be spent battling against other Presbyterians.  There is a good and necessary type of theological fighting, and then there is an over-the-top kind where you just seem angry at the world.  In my estimation, Van Til seemed to be involved in both kinds.  The gospel of salvation by grace through faith must be defended at all costs.  This is non-negotiable for those claiming to be Christians.  Van Til stood for the reality of truth.  That is, truth can be known and understood, and to oppose this truth is to be wrong.  There are many things we don’t know and don’t understand in the Bible, but the things that are clear, are clear.  To disagree with these clear truths and claim allegiance to the Bible is twisted.  Van Til referred to this as “antithesis.”  There is thesis and there is antithesis.  One is correct and one is incorrect.  No fuzzy middle.  End of story.

But there are also secondary and tertiary issues that should be discussed firmly and seriously, but with a sense of charity to the other party.  There are many things that aren’t so clear in the Bible, and there are many things that aren’t of primary importance.   Van Til seemed too militant on many of these issues.  His tone might have sounded different if I had heard him in person, but I’m not so sure.  There were times when I was reading about his life, and I seriously thought, “Man take a chill pill.  This other guy loves Jesus, and so do you, don’t die on this hill.”  But then, it’s easy to see the speck in his eye, and not the plank in my own.  So I’m not accusing so much as I’m observing.

But I think Van Til began to realize some of this at the end of his life.  Muether writes, “With former antagonists Van Til spent his last years pursuing reconciliation” (213).  Personally, I just don’t want to have to get to the end of my life before I start making amends.  I could be reading this whole thing wrong, but I wonder if Van Til had it to do over again, if he would have spent more time attacking the real enemies of Christianity and giving more grace to those whom simply disagreed with him over smaller issues.  We battle against spiritual forces after all, not physical ones.  Heresy is a spiritual enemy, but our apologetic method…not so much.

I want to keep growing in this area in my own life.  I need Jesus to continually help me see what the major issues and minor issues are.  The secondary stuff, let’s discuss it all day, but let’s keep our wits about us.

Related Posts:

Tagged in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Extended Quote of the Day – John Calvin

Apologetics,Extended Quote of the Day,Pneumatology,Theology 7 July 2011 | 0 Comments

“The testimony of the Spirit is more excellent than all reason.  For as God alone is a fit witness of himself in his Word, so also the Word will not find acceptance in men’s hearts before it is sealed by the inward testimony of the Spirit.  The same Spirit, therefore, who has spoken through the mouths of the prophets must penetrate into our hearts to persuade us that they faithfully proclaimed what had been divinely commanded.”

“He [the Holy Spirit] is the author of the Scriptures:  he cannot vary and differ from himself.  Hence he must ever remain just as he once revealed himself there.”

- John Calvin, The Institutes of the Christian Religion, 1:79, 1:94-95

Related Posts:

Tagged in , , , , , , , , , , ,

Book Review – The God Who is There – Francis Schaeffer

Apologetics,Culture,Faith,Review 4 July 2011 | 0 Comments

I love all things 1960′s culture. Many of the cultural and philosophical changes that occurred during 1960′s still affect Western society today. So, I’m not really sure why I haven’t read more of Francis Schaeffer’s writings until now. His discussion of 1960′s culture, and the surrounding decades, expertly offers theological and cultural commentary. And he does so with a heart tuned towards loving–not just callously understanding–his fellow man. The God Who is There is a good book. Having finished it, I now want to re-read, and re-think about many of Schaeffer’s arguments. Though this book was written in 1968, it still demands consideration in 2011. I’m particularly interested in Schaeffer’s thoughts as they relate to postmodernity (or the seeds of postmodernity), and how his arguments for God remain relevant, or conversely, now seem irrelevant, to the cultural milieu of 2011. Lots to think about I know! But I enjoy it! And I desperately want to understand the average postmodern person in 2011.

Related Posts:

Tagged in , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Extended Quote of the Day – Francis Schaeffer – part 2

Apologetics,Extended Quote of the Day,Faith 1 July 2011 | 0 Comments

“The problem which confronts us as we approach modern man today is not how we are to change Christian teaching in order to make it more palatable, for to do that would mean throwing away any chance of giving the real answer to man in despair; rather, it is the problem of how to communicate the gospel so that it is understood.”

- Francis Schaeffer, The God Who is There, 163.

Related Posts:

Tagged in , , , , , , ,